CBHL Logo CBHL Homepage

Resources on Botany, Horticulture, and Natural History Literature:
XVI International Botanical Congress - CBHL Posters

Contact -  Become a member -  Ask a plant librarian 

 Plant Libraries -  Publishers and Booksellers -  Resources -  Events  

About CBHL
Services &
    Activities
Annual Meetings
Annual Literature
    Award
For members only

CBHL-sponsored posters

CBHL sponsored two posters at the Congress, to help to publicize some of the issues underlying the symposium. Here are the abstracts, and full text is available on linked pages:

You're creating history today - Will it survive tomorrow?

Charlotte Tancin
Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation;
Malcolm Beasley
The Natural History Museum, London;
John F. Reed,
New York Botanical Garden)

Poster 1 Several national and international associations see botany as a field for which inadequate preservation strategies exist. Librarians and archivists are responsible for preserving the record of botanical science - a large, complex and daunting task. We can't save everything, so how do we choose? Data and records created for one purpose may be useful for other purposes later. Scientists must think about their work, published and unpublished, print and electronic. What documentation should outlive them? Who decides? Who keeps it, and how? The need for preservation transcends boundaries, requiring global thinking and local action. We need many coordinated preservation efforts all over the world, and information on their scope and status. How can the potential for global preservation action in botany be realized?



 

Back to Homepage
of XVI International Botanical Congress - CBHL Participation

Symposium

Speakers' Biographical Information

Resolution

Examples of preservation concerns

Research material worth preserving

Acknowledgments


Top of the page

ERROR: Disk unreadable

John F. Reed,
New York Botanical Garden)
Charlotte Tancin
Hunt Institute for Botanical Documentation;
Malcolm Beasley
The Natural History Museum, London;

Poster 2 Many information professionals find digitization great for access, poor for preservation. What does this mean for long-term accessibility of the record of scientific work in botany? Electronic information has become an alternative to traditional publication and information sharing, but it can deteriorate more quickly than paper. Disks fail randomly, and damaged files look like undamaged ones until they're opened (or fail to open). The ephemeral nature of electronic information, the need for constant data conversion, and the resources needed for long-term storage and retrieval all raise problems for preservation. Magnetic media are also at risk. Libraries are wrestling with these issues now. Only internationally recognized standards and an understanding of preservation requirements and limitations will safeguard scientific knowledge for the future.

Top of the page


The CBHL Symposium presented at the XVI International Botanical Congress

CBHL's Resources Assessment for Preservation and Access Committee (RAPAC)

Core Literature Project: Historical Monographs in Botanical Sciences

Glossary in preservation

Links to professional organizations and associations

Links for plant libraries and archives resources

 

   E-mail -  FAQ  -  Site Map  -  Credits  

HOME CBHL
CBHL
Updated 2004-12-01